United States v. Epps

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing issue to be close question, but holding that list of prohibited acts under § 21a-277 is indivisible list of means
• holding conviction under § 21a-277(a) does not qualify as a “controlled substance offense”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• Kaniyn Parker v. Robert Hazlewood, FCI Berlin Warden
  D. New Hampshire· 2019-03-19

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Taylor v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1990-05-29· cited 5,461×
• Descamps v. United States
  Supreme Court· 2013-06-20· cited 2,997×
• Mathis v. United States
  Supreme Court· 2016-06-23· cited 2,769×
• Schad v. Arizona
  Supreme Court· 1991-09-13· cited 1,454×
• United States v. Franklin Delano Gipson
  Fifth Circuit· 1977-06-06· cited 381×
• State v. Reynolds
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2003-06-03· cited 248×
• Esquivel-Quintana v. Sessions
  Supreme Court· 2017-05-30· cited 237×
• United States v. Savage
  Second Circuit· 2008-09-18· cited 130×
• State v. Bailey
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1988-12-13· cited 86×
• United States v. Walker
  Second Circuit· 2010-02-18· cited 74×
• State v. Suggs
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-01-31· cited 41×
• United States v. Patrick Savin
  Second Circuit· 2003-11-04· cited 29×
• State v. Mierez
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1991-05-07· cited 23×
• State v. Jackson
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1988-01-19· cited 13×
• United States v. Barrow
  E.D. New York· 2017-02-02· cited 5×
• State v. Mahon
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1999-05-11· cited 4×