United States v. Ellefsen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• viewing the record as “replete with evidence” supporting the jury’s finding as to intent where defendants “received multiple warnings” about the legality of their conduct
• explaining that distributions of profits are not deductible
• describing role of summary witness in tax evasion ease
• describing role of summary witness in tax evasion case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).