United States v. Santisteban

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Finding any Confrontation Clause violation harmless where “jury surely understood that [witness] hoped to benefit from incriminating [the defendant].”
• “ ‘To show a Brady violation, the defendant must establish that (1) the evidence was favorable to the defendant, (2) the evidence was material to guilt, and (3
• “Because the final plea agreement superseded the antecedent proffer letters,” “the government satisfied its obligations under the Due Process Clause by providing [the witness’] plea agreement to [the defendant].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).