First Circuit· 2/5/1990
United States v. Edward O'Brien
Citations
- 895 F.2d 810
- 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 1621
- 1990 WL 8707
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “we shall give such deference as we think the care and consideration manifested by the magistrate and district court warrant”
- \we shall give such deference as we think the care and consideration manifested by the magistrate and district court warrant\
- we give only “such deference as we think the care and consideration manifested by the magistrate and district court warrant”
- we give only \such deference as we think the care and consideration manifested by the magistrate and district court warrant\
- in determining pretrial release, “ ‘[a] 37 No. 1-23-2009B crucial liberty interest is at stake.’ ” (quoting United States v. Delker, 757 F.2d 1390, 1399 (3d Cir. 1985)
- in determining pretrial release, ‘ “[a] crucial liberty interest is at stake.” ’
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Torruella, Coffin, Selya
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
69 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. Carmen A. TortoraFirst Circuit· 1990-12-27· cited 155×
- United States v. Solomon Philip Panitz, United States of America v. Andrew Stewart BaumwaldFirst Circuit· 1990-07-13· cited 137×
- United States v. Raymond Lee ScottNinth Circuit· 2006-06-09· cited 114×
- United States v. Raymond J. PatriarcaFirst Circuit· 1991-10-28· cited 93×
- United States v. McAndrewsFirst Circuit· 1993-12-13· cited 85×
- United States v. John M. DillonFirst Circuit· 1991-07-16· cited 69×
- United States v. StoneSixth Circuit· 2010-06-22· cited 60×
- State of New Jersey v. C.W.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2017-03-21· cited 56×
- Quaak v. Klynveld Peat Marwick Goerdeler BedrijfsrevisorenFirst Circuit· 2004-03-08· cited 43×
- United States v. AliDistrict of Columbia· 2011-06-24· cited 36×
- Reid v. DonelanDistrict of Columbia· 2019-07-09· cited 35×
- ODonnell v. Harris CountyS.D. Texas· 2017-04-28· cited 16×
- United States v. Sheldon FidlerNinth Circuit· 2005-08-16· cited 11×
- Karpouzis v. Government of the Virgin IslandsVirgin Islands· 1997-03-27· cited 11×
- United States v. PatriarcaD. Massachusetts· 1992-08-19· cited 10×
- Lui Kin-Hong v. United StatesD. Massachusetts· 1996-04-25· cited 10×
- United States v. Chavez-RivasE.D. Wisconsin· 2008-02-27· cited 9×
- United States v. Torres-RosarioD. Puerto Rico· 2009-03-03· cited 7×
- State of New Jersey v. Amed IngramNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2017-03-01· cited 6×
- United States v. SheaD. Massachusetts· 1990-10-10· cited 5×
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. Mark JessupFirst Circuit· 1985-02-25· cited 232×
- United States v. Robert P. DelkerThird Circuit· 1985-03-27· cited 174×
- United States v. $250,000 in United States Currency, (Two Cases) Appeal of Amador Rodriguez-Ramos (Two Cases)First Circuit· 1987-01-09· cited 150×
- United States v. Antonio Jose Hurtado, Mark Anthony Olson, Diego Alonzo Flores-Soto, Hector Albert Rua and Jose Pita AndradeEleventh Circuit· 1985-12-19· cited 124×
- United States v. Hassan HazimeSixth Circuit· 1985-05-07· cited 118×
- United States v. Amir Masoud MotamediNinth Circuit· 1985-08-08· cited 108×
- United States v. Albert Samuel Fortna, Jr.Fifth Circuit· 1985-08-12· cited 105×
- United States v. Leonel PortesSeventh Circuit· 1986-03-10· cited 103×
- United States v. ChimurengaSecond Circuit· 1985-04-10· cited 94×
- United States v. Fleet Wallace MaullEighth Circuit· 1985-10-09· cited 87×
- United States v. Mark Allan BaykoFirst Circuit· 1985-09-27· cited 82×
- United States v. Anthony Provenzano, in No. 79-1912, and Thomas Andretta, in No. 79-1913Third Circuit· 1979-08-21· cited 79×
- United States v. Jean NebbiaSecond Circuit· 1966-03-09· cited 74×
- United States v. Melvin Williams, United States of America v. Glenn Moore HawkinsFourth Circuit· 1985-01-17· cited 59×
- United States v. Robert Henry GoldingFifth Circuit· 1984-09-12· cited 15×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.