United States v. Solomon Philip Panitz, United States of America v. Andrew Stewart Baumwald

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• refusal to hold evidentiary hearing on outrageousness claim proper because material facts were not in dispute
• \[A] criminal defendant has no absolute or presumptive right to insist that the district court take testimony on every motion.\
• “the existence of probable cause justifies a warrant-less seizure and reasonable search of a motor vehicle lawfully stopped in transit or parked in a public place ... ”
• collecting cases applying this standard

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).