United States v. Ebay, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a no-poach agreement between two technology companies sufficed to state a horizontal market allocation agreement
• explaining that determining whether an agreement is naked or ancillary is a factual inquiry requiring “evidence relating to the agreement’s formation and character”
• “A plaintiff is the master of its complaint and may choose which claims to allege.”
• \A plaintiff is the master of its complaint and may choose which claims to allege.\
• “At this stage in this action, the court simply cannot determine with certainty the nature of the restraint, and by extension, the level of analysis to apply.”
• “At this stage in this action, the court simply cannot determine with certainty the nature of the restraint, and by extension, the level of analysis to apply.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Bay Area Surgical Management LLC v. Aetna Life Insurance
  N.D. California· 2015-09-21· cited 4×
• Jain Irrigation, Inc. v. Netafim Irrigation, Inc.
  E.D. California· 2019-05-13· cited 2×

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Ashcroft v. Iqbal
  Supreme Court· 2009-05-18· cited 149,772×
• Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly
  Supreme Court· 2007-05-21· cited 146,720×
• Navarro v. Block
  Ninth Circuit· 2001-05-11· cited 2,226×
• Copperweld Corp. v. Independence Tube Corp.
  Supreme Court· 1984-06-19· cited 1,375×
• National Society of Professional Engineers v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1978-04-25· cited 898×
• United States v. Topco Associates, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1972-03-29· cited 788×
• National Collegiate Athletic Ass'n v. Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma
  Supreme Court· 1984-06-27· cited 776×
• Broadcast Music, Inc. v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1979-04-17· cited 694×
• Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. PSKS, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 2007-06-28· cited 452×
• Northwest Wholesale Stationers, Inc. v. Pacific Stationery & Printing Co.
  Supreme Court· 1985-06-11· cited 435×
• Texaco Inc. v. Dagher
  Supreme Court· 2006-02-28· cited 271×
• California Dental Ass'n v. Federal Trade Commission
  Supreme Court· 1999-05-24· cited 202×
• Robert Roman v. Cessna Aircraft Company and the Boeing Company
  Tenth Circuit· 1995-05-24· cited 85×
• United States v. Hal Brown, Jr., United States of America v. Michael F. Tobey
  Ninth Circuit· 1991-06-27· cited 63×
• Freeman v. San Diego Ass'n of Realtors
  Ninth Circuit· 2003-03-10· cited 59×
• In Re Sulfuric Acid Antitrust Litigation
  N.D. Illinois· 2010-09-24· cited 29×
• Inter-City Tire & Auto Center, Inc. v. Uniroyal, Inc.
  D. New Jersey· 1988-12-28· cited 16×
• Shroyer v. New Cingular Wireless Services, Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 2010-05-26· cited 6×
• Cheatham's Furniture Co. v. La-Z-Boy Chair Co.
  E.D. Missouri· 1989-12-07· cited 6×