United States v. Hal Brown, Jr., United States of America v. Michael F. Tobey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that district court did not err in \holding that it was unnecessary to instruct the jury that intent to produce anticompetitive effects is an element of the offense of which [defendants] were convicted.\
• where defendant is charged with per se violation of the Sherman Act, government need not prove intent to produce anticompetitive effects, as a finding of intent to conspire to commit the offense is sufficient

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).