D.C. Circuit· 4/9/1971
United States v. Earnest McClain
Citations
- 440 F.2d 241
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- failure to give limiting instruction on proper use of prior inconsistent statement not plain error
- “[wjhenever evidence is admitted only for a limited purpose, it is plain error, in the absence of manifest waiver, to omit an immediate cautioning instruction.”
- when evidence of other misconduct is admitted for limited purpose, it is plain error to omit cautioning instruction
- failure to give limiting instruction on proper use of prior inconsistent statement not plain error
- “[t]he doctrine of curative admissibility is one dangerously prone to overuse”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: MacKinnon, Bazelon, Wright
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
83 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. Claude L. BlackwellD.C. Circuit· 1982-12-10· cited 218×
- Irick v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1989-10-05· cited 211×
- United States v. Irie E. Leonard, United States of America v. James L. SarvisD.C. Circuit· 1974-01-31· cited 150×
- United States v. George Gordon Liddy, A/K/A George F. LeonardD.C. Circuit· 1974-11-08· cited 138×
- United States v. Lawrence Daniel Caldwell, A/K/A Thomas E. Morgan, (Two Cases). United States of America v. Eros A. Timm, (Two Cases)D.C. Circuit· 1976-09-23· cited 132×
- United States v. Anthony F. WrightD.C. Circuit· 1973-12-27· cited 130×
- Mercer v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1999-01-28· cited 96×
- United States v. Frank W. WinstonD.C. Circuit· 1971-06-30· cited 94×
- United States v. James F. JohnsonD.C. Circuit· 1986-09-30· cited 92×
- United States v. James J. YoungD.C. Circuit· 1972-05-31· cited 91×
- Dixon v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1972-01-31· cited 88×
- Middleton v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1979-04-20· cited 84×
- United States v. Thomas E. Fench, United States of America v. William H. BlackwellD.C. Circuit· 1973-01-22· cited 82×
- United States v. James Earl Fleming, Jr., Henry Lee Fleming and Tommie Earl MillenderSeventh Circuit· 1979-06-11· cited 81×
- United States v. Willie Bell, (Two Cases)D.C. Circuit· 1974-11-01· cited 80×
- Johnson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1978-05-22· cited 78×
- United States v. Lioyd Lee, Jr.D.C. Circuit· 1974-12-09· cited 75×
- United States v. John Conley, Jr.Eighth Circuit· 1975-10-21· cited 69×
- United States v. BrunerD.C. Circuit· 1981-06-23· cited 69×
- United States v. Garnell S. RobinsonD.C. Circuit· 1976-02-20· cited 67×
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. AtkinsonSupreme Court· 1936-02-03· cited 1,580×
- Palmer v. HoffmanSupreme Court· 1943-03-01· cited 1,191×
- Nathan L. Drew v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1964-02-13· cited 860×
- United States v. Donald Kenneth CurrensThird Circuit· 1961-05-01· cited 193×
- United States v. Charles W. DeatonSecond Circuit· 1967-07-28· cited 83×
- O'Day v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1967-04-10· cited 74×
- Joseph Wakaksan, Jr. v. United StatesEighth Circuit· 1966-10-31· cited 65×
- Pennsylvania Railroad v. MindsSupreme Court· 1919-06-09· cited 61×
- United States v. Victor Domenic CifarelliSecond Circuit· 1968-12-09· cited 56×
- Aaron Jones v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1967-09-29· cited 53×
- John F. Golden, Jr. v. United StatesFirst Circuit· 1963-06-18· cited 47×
- Burns v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1927-05-16· cited 46×
- United States v. Harold W. BarbourD.C. Circuit· 1969-10-09· cited 39×
- Griffin v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1947-12-08· cited 38×
- Robert Roberts, Jr. v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1960-06-09· cited 24×
- Luther O. Troublefield v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1967-01-13· cited 11×
- Mansell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1963-01-02· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.