D.C. Circuit· 7/23/2004
United States v. Earle, James
Citations
- 375 F.3d 1159
- 363 U.S. App. D.C. 19
- 64 Fed. R. Serv. 1029
- 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 15251
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- closing argument improper where ‘‘the prosecutor clearly had every reason to doubt, and no good reason to support, the inferences he propounded to the jury’’
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ginsburg, Henderson, Williams
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. AbelSupreme Court· 1984-12-10· cited 1,044×
- United States v. Oliver L. NorthD.C. Circuit· 1990-08-22· cited 326×
- United States v. Gartmon, Richard L.D.C. Circuit· 1998-07-14· cited 101×
- United States v. Long, KennethD.C. Circuit· 2003-05-16· cited 101×
- United States v. Roy Shelby BluefordNinth Circuit· 2002-11-22· cited 67×
- United States v. Watson, Talib D.D.C. Circuit· 1999-04-09· cited 51×
- United States of America, and Cross-Appellant v. Longino Xavier Edelin, and Cross-AppelleeD.C. Circuit· 1993-09-09· cited 35×
- United States v. Smith, AntonioneD.C. Circuit· 2000-11-24· cited 18×
- United States v. Rodger EdmondsD.C. Circuit· 1995-11-17· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.