D.C. Circuit· 7/23/2004
United States v. Earle, James
Citations
- 375 F.3d 1159
- 363 U.S. App. D.C. 19
- 64 Fed. R. Serv. 1029
- 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 15251
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- closing argument improper where ‘‘the prosecutor clearly had every reason to doubt, and no good reason to support, the inferences he propounded to the jury’’
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ginsburg, Henderson, Williams
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.