United States v. Doelker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• although plaintiff’s statistical expert “fail[ed] to link any pay differential that she found to any [employer] policy or practice,” that deficiency did not render the report “irrelevant” but rather simply limited 61 its probative value

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).