Skip to main content
· 5/18/1970

United States v. Arthur J. Porth

Citations

  • 426 F.2d 519

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that form listing income as zero and containing constitutional objection to the imposition of a tax, was not a return
  • name and address on a form is insufficient to make it a valid return because it lacks information from which the taxpayer's tax liability can be computed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pickett, Breitenstein, Seth

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.