Skip to main content
Fifth Circuit· 6/23/2009

United States v. Dison

Citations

  • 573 F.3d 204
  • 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 14054
  • 2009 WL 1759029

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “When the plain language of a statute is unambiguous and does not lead to an absurd result, our inquiry begins and ends with the plain meaning of that language.” (cleaned up)
  • applying § 3C1.3 for violation of § 3146

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wiener, Dennis, Clement

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named United States v. Dison

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.