Skip to main content
E.D. New York· 8/8/2012

United States v. Dimattina

Citations

  • 885 F. Supp. 2d 572
  • 2012 WL 3260216

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • following the weight of authority in holding that district courts can order release pursuant to § 3145(c), but also noting that this authority “appear[s] to have been misguided”
  • “There is no evidence that any of the affiants whose testimony is offered in support of the motion were unknown to the defendant at the time of trial.”
  • “If a district court is without power to grant release of a defendant who would otherwise be eligible for such relief, federal law mandates incarceration until a court of appeals decides to release him. Yet section 3145(c
  • internal citations omitted; emphasis added; clarifying alterations in original

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Weinstein

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

39 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named United States v. Dimattina

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.