Skip to main content
· 6/21/2005

United States of America, Cross-Appellee v. John Canova

Citations

  • 412 F.3d 331
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 11901
  • 2005 WL 1444147

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that enhancement applies when defendant willfully testifies falsely regarding material matters with the specific intent to obstruct justice
  • rejecting argument that abbreviated medical tests performed by the defendant were as clinically sound as full tests required by Medicare so that the government sustained no loss
  • applying predecessor Guidelines application note governing procurement fraud and product substitution cases

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sack, Raggi

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.