Fifth Circuit· 10/3/1997
United States v. Dees
Citations
- 125 F.3d 261
- 1997 WL 606405
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that exercising \magisterial power can violate the structural guarantees of Article III\
- “So long as a plea is informed and voluntary, we will enforce a waiver of appeal.”
- magistrate judge “recommended” district court accept the defendant's plea
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: King, Higginbotham, Duhé
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. Jose Francisco Reyna-Tapia, AKA Jose ReynaNinth Circuit· 2003-05-09· cited 5,140×
- United States v. BentonFourth Circuit· 2008-04-28· cited 354×
- United States v. BaymonFifth Circuit· 2002-11-15· cited 154×
- Freeman v. County of BexarFifth Circuit· 1998-06-01· cited 130×
- United States v. SharpeFifth Circuit· 1999-10-20· cited 107×
- United States v. Jack BeardenSixth Circuit· 2001-12-18· cited 107×
- United States v. Betty Anne OsborneFourth Circuit· 2003-10-09· cited 91×
- Santos-Sanchez v. United StatesFifth Circuit· 2008-11-06· cited 71×
- United States v. BrighamFifth Circuit· 2009-05-20· cited 54×
- Leo J. Callier Anthony J. Callier v. Charles H. GraySixth Circuit· 1999-03-25· cited 48×
- United States v. Bolivar-MunozFifth Circuit· 2002-11-20· cited 44×
- United States v. Edward John Johnston, Iii, Also Known as Easy, Also Known as Ez, Also Known as Charles Edward Johnson, IIIFifth Circuit· 2001-07-13· cited 37×
- United States v. Yudeluis Jimenez-ElvirezFifth Circuit· 2017-07-10· cited 35×
- United States v. David Lee WoodardEleventh Circuit· 2004-10-18· cited 28×
- United States v. Stacy Harden, Jr.Seventh Circuit· 2014-07-14· cited 27×
- United States v. Jaime Torres, Also Known as Jamie Torres, Also Known as Jaime Torres CastellanosEighth Circuit· 2001-08-03· cited 24×
- State v. ChristianSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2003-02-13· cited 19×
- United States v. UnderwoodFifth Circuit· 2010-02-18· cited 16×
- Jones v. JohnsonFifth Circuit· 1998-01-29· cited 11×
- United States v. Jose Francisco Reyna-Tapia, AKA Jose ReynaNinth Circuit· 2002-06-28· cited 4×
Cites
24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1986-04-30· cited 16,401×
- United States v. RaddatzSupreme Court· 1980-08-22· cited 3,232×
- Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court· 1982-10-04· cited 3,187×
- Swain v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1965-03-08· cited 3,183×
- Thomas v. Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co.Supreme Court· 1985-07-01· cited 1,222×
- Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. SchorSupreme Court· 1986-07-07· cited 991×
- Gomez v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1989-06-12· cited 981×
- Peretz v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1991-06-27· cited 631×
- National Mutual Insurance v. Tidewater Transfer Co.Supreme Court· 1949-10-10· cited 328×
- United States v. Brian MelanconFifth Circuit· 1992-10-08· cited 310×
- Aldridge v. United States District CourtSupreme Court· 1994-12-05· cited 200×
- United States v. AbreoFifth Circuit· 1994-08-10· cited 109×
- United States v. Lloyd WilliamsSecond Circuit· 1994-04-20· cited 87×
- United States v. Lois E. Hilton FordFifth Circuit· 1987-08-11· cited 55×
- United States v. George M. Ciapponi, AKA George Norman SchreiberTenth Circuit· 1996-03-28· cited 55×
- In Re Raymond Clay and Scott Clay, D/B/A the EmporiumFifth Circuit· 1994-10-03· cited 44×
- Ford v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1988-01-19· cited 33×
- McFarland v. Leyh (In re Texas General Petroleum Corp.)Fifth Circuit· 1995-06-01· cited 32×
- United States v. Robert Mendoza, Reuben O. Mendoza, Jr., and Yolanda Ashton OrtizFifth Circuit· 1974-03-21· cited 28×
- United States v. Lazaro F. RojasFifth Circuit· 1990-03-29· cited 17×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.