· 4/29/1978
United States v. David S. Kuck
Citations
- 573 F.2d 25
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting a contention that the imposition of a special parole term is cruel and unusual punishment under the Eighth Amendment
- “A sentencing statute is not unconstitutional because of failure to provide a maximum term.”
- “Although the Eighth Amendment is a constitutional limitation on congressionally prescribed penalties, legislative provision for a penalty is some indication that it does not offend the evolving standards of decency that mark the progress of a maturing society.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Barrett, Breitenstein, Logan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.