· 12/12/1995
PEOPLE of the Territory of Guam, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Pedro D. MATERNE, Defendant-Appellant
Citations
- 72 F.3d 103
- 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9436
- 95 Daily Journal DAR 16447
- 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 35024
- 1995 WL 733953
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the rule of lenity applies \where a criminal statute is vague enough to deem both the defendant's and the government's interpretations of it as reasonable\
- “[T]he rule of lenity applies where a criminal statute is vague enough to deem both the defendant’s and the government’s interpretations of it as reasonable.”
- “[T]he rule of lenity applies where a criminal statute is vague enough to deem both the defendant’s and the government’s interpretations of it as reasonable.”
- “Only where the defendant’s interpretation is unreasonable does the rule of lenity not apply.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Fletcher, Poole, O'Scannlain
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.