Skip to main content
· 12/12/1995

PEOPLE of the Territory of Guam, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Pedro D. MATERNE, Defendant-Appellant

Citations

  • 72 F.3d 103
  • 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9436
  • 95 Daily Journal DAR 16447
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 35024
  • 1995 WL 733953

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the rule of lenity applies \where a criminal statute is vague enough to deem both the defendant's and the government's interpretations of it as reasonable\
  • “[T]he rule of lenity applies where a criminal statute is vague enough to deem both the defendant’s and the government’s interpretations of it as reasonable.”
  • “[T]he rule of lenity applies where a criminal statute is vague enough to deem both the defendant’s and the government’s interpretations of it as reasonable.”
  • “Only where the defendant’s interpretation is unreasonable does the rule of lenity not apply.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fletcher, Poole, O'Scannlain

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.