United States v. David Litwin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the Government failed to show harmlessness in part because “there is [] reason to believe [the removed juror] had views on the merits of the case”
• noting that the Government failed to show harmlessness in part because “there is [] reason to believe [the removed juror] had views on the merits of the case”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).