United States v. David Foote

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• collecting cases and concluding that “[n]o circuit has held that possession of marijuana (or other drugs) is similar to any of the Guidelines’ enumerated exceptions”
• declining to weigh factor five because “we have no data on whether the recidivism rate for minor traffic infractions (such as speeding) is any lower than the recidivism rate for minor misdemeanor possession of marijuana”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).