United States v. David Christopher McKenzie

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the defendant was not entitled to a downward departure under Application Note 5 because the term of imprisonment imposed for his predicate aggravated felony exceeded one year and he therefore did not satisfy the third criterion in the Note

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• United States v. Roberto Echavarria-Escobar, Aka, Roberto Escobar Aka, Baudilo Echeveria Aka, Roberto Car Escobar-Rodriguez
  Ninth Circuit· 2001-10-18· cited 67×
• United States v. Rose Hajay Bernard
  Third Circuit· 2004-06-29· cited 50×
• United States v. Dennis Llewellyn Tappin
  Second Circuit· 2000-03-09· cited 29×
• United States v. Oscar Maldonado-Ramirez
  Eleventh Circuit· 2000-07-19· cited 22×
• United States v. Roberto Palomino-Rivera
  Seventh Circuit· 2001-07-20· cited 21×
• United States v. Ignacio Tejeda-Perez
  Eighth Circuit· 1999-12-23· cited 20×
• United States v. Derrick Taylor
  Sixth Circuit· 2002-04-10· cited 18×
• United States v. Jairo MacHiche AKA Jairo MacHiche
  Ninth Circuit· 2002-04-18· cited 6×
• United States v. Oscar Maldonado-Ramirez
  Eleventh Circuit· 2000-06-26
• United States v. Palomino-Rivera
  Seventh Circuit· 2001-07-20
• United States v. Bernard
  Third Circuit· 2004-06-29

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• The United States v. Peter Huff, John James Davis. Appeal of Peter Huff
  Third Circuit· 1989-05-10· cited 71×
• United States v. Ernesto Chavez-Valenzuela, Also Known as Ernesto Chavez-Quintero
  Tenth Circuit· 1999-03-26· cited 40×