United States v. Rose Hajay Bernard

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining in dicta that “U.S.S.G. § 1B1.2(c) applies to situations where the defendant has stipulated to facts that establish the commission of additional offenses[.]”
• describing generally the operation of the cross‐reference under § 2L2.2(c) and § 2X1.1
• “We exercise plenary review over the question of whether the terms of a plea agreement have been violated.”
• “[A] sentencing court has the authority to accept a plea agreement stipulating to a sentencing factor or a provision of the sentencing guidelines that otherwise would not apply, or specifying a sentence that falls outside the applicable guidelines range.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).