Skip to main content
· 4/26/1999

United States v. Dauray

Citations

  • 76 F. Supp. 2d 191
  • 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18953
  • 1999 WL 1132800

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The word ‘contain’ as used in the statute can mean both that items that enclose or hold visual depictions of minors engaged in sexually explicit conduct are included within the statute’s ambit (such as a book

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Arterton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.