United States v. Darryl Cleaves

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding it unnecessary to examine the effect of a plain error on the judicial proceedings because “no rational jury could have found that [the defendant] was involved in a conspiracy to distribute marijuana rather than cocaine”
• “Under Apprendi, failure to instruct the jury to determine both the type of drug, and the drug quantity involved in the conspiracy amounted to plain error.”
• Closing Arguments, Trial Tr. at 19
• Closing Arguments, Trial Tr. at 15

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).