Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Ninth Circuit· 6/5/2007

United States v. Darrel Duane Grisel

Citations

  • 488 F.3d 844
  • 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 13001
  • 2007 WL 1599009

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that a state law explicitly defined “building” to have meanings “in addition to its ordinary meaning”
  • rejecting argument that dates of prior convictions not part of \'fact'\ of prior convictions
  • finding a categorical mismatch because Oregon’s burglary statute was broader than the federal crime because it explicitly included entrance into places like booths, vehicles, boats, and aircrafts that were explicitly excluded from the federal definition
  • adopting Sweeten 's analysis to hold that § 30.02(a)(1) is generic
  • “We are not convinced by any of [defendant’s] arguments challenging his identification. . . . [The victim’s] credibility was not seriously in dispute. This was not an unreliable criminal informant, but a complaining victim who had no apparent reason to lie.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Schroeder, Pregerson, Reinhardt, Rymer, Kleinfeld, Hawkins, Tashima, Graber, Wardlaw, Gould, Paez, Berzon, Tallman, Rawlinson, Bea

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

142 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named United States v. Darrel Duane Grisel

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.