United States v. Ankeny

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recounting that officer announced “police, search warrant” before breaking down the defendant’s door
• observing manner in which warrant is executed, including use of force and destruction of property, is subject to judicial review for reasonableness under the Fourth Amendment
• affirming denial of motion to suppress based on use of flash bangs
• declining to decide “close” Fourth Amendment question where suppression was “not appropriate”
• noting first- and second-degree burns caused by explosion of flash-bang device
• \There is no requirement that the police obtain a no-knock warrant simply because one is available.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named United States v. Ankeny

5 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• United States v. Ankeny
  United States Court of Military Appeals· 1990-03-30· cited 15×
• United States v. Ankeny
  D. Oregon· 2005-03-03· cited 6×
• United States v. Ankeny
  U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review· 1989-03-27· cited 4×
• United States v. Ankeny
  Ninth Circuit· 2007-06-18
• United States v. Ankeny
  Ninth Circuit· 2007-09-05