United States v. Darin Quintero

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding federal court lacks authority
• holding federal court lacks authority
• “We hold that 18 U.S.C. § 3584(a) does not authorize district courts to order a sentence to be served consecutively to a not-yet-imposed state sentence.”
• “[T]he District Court erred when it ordered the defendant’s sentence to be served consecutively to a yet to be imposed state sentence. We remand to the District Court for sentencing consistent with this opinion.”
• “[T]he District Court erred when it ordered the defendant’s sentence to be served consecutively to a yet to be imposed state sentence. We remand to the District Court for sentencing consistent with this opinion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).