Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Fourth Circuit· 11/20/2019

United States v. Daniel Wirsing

Citations

  • 943 F.3d 175

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that § 3582(c)(1)(B) is the appropriate vehicle for consideration of First Step Act motions
  • holding that whether a defendant was convicted of a “covered offense” under the First Step Act turns solely on the statute of conviction and not the defendant’s specific conduct
  • identifying Section 2255 as a statute expressly permitting modification of a sentence under Section 3582(c)(1)(B)
  • “Congress left the decision as to whether to grant a sentence reduction to the district court’s discretion.”
  • “Congress left the decision as to whether to grant a sentence reduction to the district court’s discretion.”
  • “Congress left the decision as to whether to grant a sentence reduction to the district court’s discretion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named United States v. Daniel Wirsing

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.