United States v. Raymond Allen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the “Fair Sentencing Act applied to [a defendant] is a question of law which [this Court] decide[s] de novo”
• explaining that the “Fair Sentencing Act applied to [a defendant] is a question of law which [this Court] decide[s] de novo”
• explaining that the “Fair Sentencing Act applied to [a defendant] is a question of law which [this Court] decide[s] de novo”
• concluding that evidence of 3.5 ounces of crack cocaine—“enough to produce over 1000 crack rocks”—supported 10 knowledge of a distribution conspiracy because, in our view, “[i]t is hard to fathom that one would purchase in short order the equivalent of [that much drugs] for personal use”
• “Whether the new threshold amount announced in the Fair Sentencing Act applie[s] to [the appellant] is a question of law which we decide de novo.”
• “Whether the new threshold amount announced in the Fair Sentencing Act applie[s] to [the appellant] is a question of law which we decide de novo.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).