United States v. Daniel Musa

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• remanding a case where the district court failed to make the required finding that the defendant organized or led another participant in the criminal scheme to justify the § 3B1.1 enhancement
• “[W]e remand the case to provide the district court the opportunity to clarify whether [the defendant] organized or led at least one other participant, and to identify what evidence in this record supports that finding.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• United States v. Jorge Sainz Navarrete
  Eighth Circuit· 2020-04-08· cited 20×
• United States v. Candice Davis
  Eighth Circuit· 2017-11-16· cited 19×
• United States v. Breon Armstrong
  Eighth Circuit· 2023-02-24· cited 9×
• United States v. Bryant Ford
  Eighth Circuit· 2021-02-17· cited 7×
• United States v. Mark Arlin Hammerschmidt
  Eighth Circuit· 2018-02-02· cited 6×
• United States v. Asmerom Keleta
  Eighth Circuit· 2020-02-06· cited 2×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Adetokunbo Adejumo
  Eighth Circuit· 2014-11-25· cited 51×
• United States v. Adekunle Olufemi Adetiloye
  Eighth Circuit· 2013-05-03· cited 32×
• United States v. Bolden
  Eighth Circuit· 2010-03-08· cited 32×
• United States v. Randy Irlmeier
  Eighth Circuit· 2014-04-28· cited 25×
• United States v. Rodriguez-Ramos
  Eighth Circuit· 2011-12-09· cited 24×
• United States v. Noel Vasquez-Rubio, Also Known as Primo
  Eighth Circuit· 2002-08-19· cited 18×