· 5/3/2013
United States v. Adekunle Olufemi Adetiloye
Citations
- 716 F.3d 1030
- 2013 WL 1845520
- 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 9124
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that forfeiture and restitution “are different concepts”: one is based on the defendant’s gain and the other on the victims’ losses
- noting that remand was appropriate to fulfill purpose of restitution statute
- government may meet its burden of proof as to the loss amount by introducing testimony from an investigating officer
- “Where, as here, the defendant has objected to the amount of loss attributable to him” under the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act, the government must meet its burden of proof
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wollman, Bye, Benton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.