Skip to main content
· 5/3/2013

United States v. Adekunle Olufemi Adetiloye

Citations

  • 716 F.3d 1030
  • 2013 WL 1845520
  • 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 9124

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that forfeiture and restitution “are different concepts”: one is based on the defendant’s gain and the other on the victims’ losses
  • noting that remand was appropriate to fulfill purpose of restitution statute
  • government may meet its burden of proof as to the loss amount by introducing testimony from an investigating officer
  • “Where, as here, the defendant has objected to the amount of loss attributable to him” under the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act, the government must meet its burden of proof

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wollman, Bye, Benton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.