Eighth Circuit· 10/29/1990

United States v. Daniel Joseph Boyer

Citations

914 F.2d 144

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

finding statements admissible when’ made outside the context for the request for counsel in a limited invocation circumstance
finding the suspect's request for counsel was limited to making a tape-recorded phone call
finding ordinary meaning of the defendant’s request for an attorney before he would assist police in making a tape-recorded telephone call to a person whom he had sent drugs was that the defendant’s invocation of counsel only applied to making a tape-recorded phone call
finding ordinary meaning of the defendant’s request for an attorney before he would assist police in making a tape-recorded telephone call to a person whom he had sent drugs was that the defendant’s invocation of counsel only applied to making a tape-recorded phone call
\[A] limited invocation of the right to counsel does not preclude the admissibility of statements a defendant makes which fall outside the limited invocation.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Arnold, Wollman, Gibson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.