United States v. Daniel Joseph Boyer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding statements admissible when’ made outside the context for the request for counsel in a limited invocation circumstance
• finding the suspect's request for counsel was limited to making a tape-recorded phone call
• finding ordinary meaning of the defendant’s request for an attorney before he would assist police in making a tape-recorded telephone call to a person whom he had sent drugs was that the defendant’s invocation of counsel only applied to making a tape-recorded phone call
• finding ordinary meaning of the defendant’s request for an attorney before he would assist police in making a tape-recorded telephone call to a person whom he had sent drugs was that the defendant’s invocation of counsel only applied to making a tape-recorded phone call
• \[A] limited invocation of the right to counsel does not preclude the admissibility of statements a defendant makes which fall outside the limited invocation.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).