Seventh Circuit· 10/20/2017

United States v. Daniel Contreras

Citations

874 F.3d 280
2017 WL 4707506
2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 20616

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that “evidence of eight transactions, most within a two-month period, support[ed] the courts’ findings that significant deals were occurring frequently enough for the home to be deemed, in es- sence, a drug den for the purposes of § 2D1.1(b)(12)”
upholding application of enhancement based on \evidence that drugs were shipped to and stored at Contreras's home\ and that \Contreras accepted payment for drugs at his home\
upholding application of enhance- ment based on “evidence that drugs were shipped to and stored at Con- treras’s home” and that “Contreras accepted payment for drugs at his home”
defendant sold drugs out of his home eight times, with seven transactions within two months

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kanne, Rovner, Sykes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.