United States v. Cryar

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discussing favorably the argument that “dominant purpose” was beyond what was needed to convict under 18 U.S.C. § 2241(c), because “[§] 2241(c
• ʺIt is certainly not the crossing alone but the crossing in order to engage in sexual activity with underage persons that is criminal.ʺ

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).