Skip to main content
· 5/19/1995

United States v. Conyers

Citations

  • 888 F. Supp. 3
  • 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7695
  • 1995 WL 340040

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • in a case very similar to the one at bar, the federal district court held that neither waiver nor estoppel could be asserted to extend coverage under a policy in which coverage was specifically excluded

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sporkin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.