State of Arizona v. Dennis Johnson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a charge of improper motive based on receipt of immigration benefits opens the door to prior consistent statement
• holding that a charge of improper motive based on receipt of immigration benefits opens the door to prior consistent statement
• holding that a charge of improper motive based on receipt of immigration benefits opens the door to prior consistent statement
• holding that the court acted within its discretion when it refused to answer directly the jury’s question but reread original, legally correct instructions, as the court was concerned that a direct answer might mislead or improperly influence the jury
• ruling that trial judge’s “wide discretion” carries over to jury question responses
• upholding, under the abuse of discretion standard, a trial court’s supplemental instruction defining “consent” in a sexual assault prosecution through “a non-exclusive list of examples of what ‘without consent’ includes”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).