United States v. Clyde Lamerson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “had [defendant] not committed a crime, we would not be” prosecuting him
• when prosecutor’s statement could be construed by the jury as implying that he has additional reasons for knowing a witness’ veracity, “which reasons are not known to the jury, such comment is no longer mere indiscretion but constitutes reversible error”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).