Tenth Circuit· 5/6/2003

United States v. Cisneros

Citations

328 F.3d 610
2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 8569
2003 WL 21008844

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

recognizing that the United States “need not offer all of its evidence” at the detention stage of the criminal proceeding
recognizing that the United States “need not offer all of its evidence” at the detention stage of the criminal proceeding
recognizing that the United States “need not offer all of its evidence” at the detention stage of the criminal proceeding
holding that “review of a detention or release order” under § 3142(f) may only be “conducted by the same judicial officer who entered the order”
holding that a magistrate judge in the prosecuting district did not have the authority to address the government’s revocation motion challenging an order issued by a magistrate judge in the arresting district
explaining that we review the district court’s ultimate detention or release decision de novo because it presents mixed questions of law and fact, but we review the underlying findings of fact for clear error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Seymour, Ebel, Hartz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

40 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named United States v. Cisneros

25 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.