Skip to main content
· 9/6/2013

United States v. Christopher Eads

Citations

  • 729 F.3d 769
  • 2013 WL 4774521
  • 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 18737

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding the district court’s Rule 403 analysis insufficient where it did not explain the specific probative value or risk of prejudice presented by the evidence
  • finding the district court’s Rule 403 analysis insufficient where it did not explain the specific probative value or risk of prejudice presented by the evidence
  • finding the district court’s Rule 403 analysis insufficient where it did not explain the specific probative value or risk of prejudice presented by the evidence
  • “[O]ur task is to examine the record as a whole to see if [the defendant] ‘knowingly and intelligently’ waived his right to counsel.”
  • “[O]ur task is to examine the record as a whole to see if [the defendant] ‘knowingly and intelligently’ waived his right to counsel.”
  • “A stipulation about the content of charged images only goes so far if it is silent with respect to the defendant’s knowledge of the images in his possession.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ripple, Rovner, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.