United States v. Christopher

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “the long-standing derivative jurisdiction doctrine provides 2 that if a state court lacks jurisdiction over a case, a federal court does not acquire jurisdiction on 3 removal”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Scott Franz
  Seventh Circuit· 1989-10-04· cited 187×
• Steven J. Holman and Karen L. Holman v. State of Indiana and Indiana Department of Transportation
  Seventh Circuit· 2000-05-01· cited 168×
• United States v. David Lanzotti and Connie L. Hughes
  Seventh Circuit· 2000-02-15· cited 128×
• United States v. Randall E. Coonce
  Seventh Circuit· 1992-04-14· cited 103×
• United States v. Milquette, Darryl
  Seventh Circuit· 2000-06-02· cited 28×
• United States v. Darin Senn
  Seventh Circuit· 1996-12-13· cited 23×
• United States v. Kevin Winters
  Seventh Circuit· 1997-06-25· cited 15×
• United States v. Abel Chavez-Chavez
  Seventh Circuit· 2000-05-23· cited 15×