United States v. Charles A. Covington

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying abuse of discretion review to the district court's refusal to grant a mistrial because of communication between witnesses
• district court's response to improper communication between witnesses reviewed for abuse of discretion
• testimony of experienced narcotics officer sufficient to establish identity of controlled substance
• this court’s review of factual determinations with respect to offenses in the criminal history computation pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1 “‘are subject to a “clearly erroneous” standard of review,’” quoting United States v. Lowe, 930 F.2d 645, 646-47 (8th Cir. 1991

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).