United States v. Carruth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “[f]or a plain error to have occurred, the error must be one that is obvious and is clear under current law.”
• “For a plain error to have occurred, the error must be one that is obvious or clear under current law.”
• “There was no specific language in the original plea waiver indicating that Carruth’s willingness to waive his right to appeal from a sentence entered in accordance with the original plea was also a waiver of his right to appeal from his future supervised release revocation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).