United States v. John Daniels

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a district court commits plain error when it does not offer a supervised releasee the chance to allocute before imposing a sentence
• “Rule 32.1(b)(2)(E) requires a court to address a supervised releasee personally to ask if he wants to speak before the court -2- imposes a post-revocation sentence”
• right to allocute is “fundamental to our criminal justice system”
• “assum[ing] without deciding that plain error review applies”
• “as-sum[ing] without deciding that plain error review applies”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).