Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Ninth Circuit· 7/23/2014

United States v. John Daniels

Citations

  • 760 F.3d 920
  • 2014 WL 3608716
  • 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 14043

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a district court commits plain error when it does not offer a supervised releasee the chance to allocute before imposing a sentence
  • “Rule 32.1(b)(2)(E) requires a court to address a supervised releasee personally to ask if he wants to speak before the court -2- imposes a post-revocation sentence”
  • right to allocute is “fundamental to our criminal justice system”
  • “assum[ing] without deciding that plain error review applies”
  • “as-sum[ing] without deciding that plain error review applies”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gould, Smith, Korman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named United States v. John Daniels

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.