United States v. Carpenter

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[U]ntil parties have notice that the government may not be representing their interests, parties are entitled to rely on the presumption that the government is representing their interests.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Great Old Broads for Wildernes v. Abigail Kimbell
  Ninth Circuit· 2013-03-04· cited 52×
• United States v. Carpenter
  Ninth Circuit· 2008-05-20· cited 34×
• Richard D. Warren Elizabeth K. Warren v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
  Ninth Circuit· 2002-08-26· cited 8×
• United States v. Carpenter
  Ninth Circuit· 2002-08-12· cited 6×
• Waterlegacy v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
  D. Minnesota· 2014-06-02· cited 5×
• Unnamed case
  Ninth Circuit· 2007-04-16· cited 1×
• United States v. the Wilderness Socie
  Ninth Circuit· 2008-05-19

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• 16 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1089, 16 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 8164 Maria Alaniz v. Tillie Lewis Foods, Robert Beaver, Applicant-Intervenors
  Ninth Circuit· 1978-04-03· cited 83×
• Unnamed case
  Ninth Circuit· 1991-06-11· cited 12×