United States v. Carew

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that even after Apprendi was decided, “counsel’s failure to predict Booker’s constitutional and remedial holdings is not objectively unreasonable”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Slack v. McDaniel
  Supreme Court· 2000-04-26· cited 41,291×
• Apprendi v. New Jersey
  Supreme Court· 2000-06-26· cited 28,372×
• Miller-El v. Cockrell
  Supreme Court· 2003-02-25· cited 27,550×
• Haines v. Kerner
  Supreme Court· 1972-02-22· cited 26,103×
• United States v. Booker
  Supreme Court· 2004-10-01· cited 23,210×
• Blakely v. Washington
  Supreme Court· 2004-06-24· cited 13,994×
• Hill v. Lockhart
  Supreme Court· 1985-11-18· cited 11,299×
• Bousley v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1998-05-18· cited 5,336×
• United States v. Gonzalez-Huerta
  Tenth Circuit· 2005-04-08· cited 733×
• United States v. Price
  Tenth Circuit· 2005-03-08· cited 134×
• United States of America v. Carless Jones
  Tenth Circuit· 2000-12-19· cited 118×
• United States v. Bellamy
  Tenth Circuit· 2005-06-16· cited 117×
• United States v. Harry Jamar Gordon
  Tenth Circuit· 1999-04-07· cited 56×
• United States v. Iris Collette Jackson
  Tenth Circuit· 2001-02-27· cited 43×