United States v. Caci

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• a case that erroneously relied on Lockwood, an opinion on the admissibility of expert opinion testimony, to find “could” or “might” testimony sufficient to prove causation
• a case that erroneously relied on Lockwood an opinion on the admissibility of expert opinion testimony, to find “could” or “might” testimony sufficient to prove causation
• a case that erroneously relied on Lockwood an opinion on the admissibility of expert opinion testimony, to find \could\ or \might\ testimony sufficient to prove causation
• a case that erroneously relied on Lockwood, an opinion on the admissibility of expert opinion testimony, to find \could\ or \might\ testimony sufficient to prove causation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).