Sixth Circuit· 1/22/2016

United States v. Cabrera

Citations

811 F.3d 801
2016 FED App. 0017P
2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 1103
2016 WL 279438

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that a within- guidelines sentence was procedurally unreasonable because it was based on the defendant’s refusal to testify
noting that procedural reasonableness asks whether the district court “based” its sentence upon impermissible factors
stating that there is “no constitutional right to file frivolous litigation” (quoting United States v. Miller, 531 F.3d 340, 351 (6th Cir. 2008)); Wolfe v. George, 486 F.3d 1120, 1125 (9th Cir. 2007
exercising discretion to remand a procedurally unreasonable sentence on the fourth prong of plain error in light of Gall and Rita
identifying “the right to meaningful appellate review” as “a substantial right that does not require a showing of prejudice”
identifying “the right to meaningful appellate review” as “a substantial right that does not require a showing of prejudice”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Clay, Gilman, Moore

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

39 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named United States v. Cabrera

40 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.