Skip to main content
· 2/27/2009

United States v. Boring

Citations

  • 557 F.3d 707
  • 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 4022
  • 2009 WL 483238

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reviewing the amount of a restitution award for abuse of discretion
  • “[T]he district court may not include in its calculation of a restitution award the worker’s compensation payments to which [the defendant] was legitimately entitled, since those do not constitute losses to the victim and thus are not properly the subject of restitution.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Merritt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.