S.D. New York· 2/10/1984
United States v. Blohm
Citations
- 579 F. Supp. 495
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- Dusky standard not satisfied when, although he had factual understanding of the proceedings, the defendant harbored certain delusional beliefs that rendered him \unable to consult with his lawyer and assist in his own defense\
- Dusky standard not satisfied when, although he had factual understanding of the proceedings, the defendant harbored certain delusional beliefs that rendered him “unable to consult with his lawyer and assist in his own defense”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sweet
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Turner, Albert JamesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2013-10-30· cited 223×
- Damacio Y. Torres v. K.W. Prunty, in His Capacity as WardenNinth Circuit· 2000-09-08· cited 159×
- People v. MixonCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1990-11-27· cited 37×
- Farm Credit Bank of St. Paul v. BrakkeNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1994-03-08· cited 36×
- Martin v. DuggerS.D. Florida· 1988-06-01· cited 32×
- Provenzano v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1999-09-23· cited 12×
- United States v. RigginS.D. Indiana· 1990-03-20· cited 6×
- United States v. NagyS.D. New York· 1998-09-03· cited 6×
- United States v. MarshallN.D. Texas· 1999-12-09· cited 3×
- United States v. SalleyN.D. Illinois· 2003-01-31· cited 3×
- United States v. BlohmS.D. New York· 1984-04-26· cited 2×
- United States v. HarmonN.D. Texas· 1998-10-23· cited 2×
- United States v. TurnerS.D. New York· 1985-02-21· cited 1×
- United States v. SegalN.D. Illinois· 2005-10-12· cited 1×
- Daniel D. v. Linda C.NYC Family Court· 2009-03-04· cited 1×
- Turner, Albert JamesCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2015-01-21
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Dusky v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1960-04-18· cited 3,197×
- Pate v. RobinsonSupreme Court· 1966-03-21· cited 3,039×
- Drope v. MissouriSupreme Court· 1975-02-19· cited 2,695×
- Jackson v. IndianaSupreme Court· 1972-06-07· cited 1,284×
- Melvin R. Laird, Secretary of Defense v. Arlo TatumSupreme Court· 1972-10-10· cited 291×
- Lupo v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1977-01-10· cited 153×
- United States v. John Digilio, in No. 75-2218. Appeal of Harry Lupo, in No. 75-2219. Appeal of Peter Szwandrak, in No. 75-2220Third Circuit· 1976-08-10· cited 151×
- United States v. Karl J. BrayTenth Circuit· 1976-12-06· cited 125×
- United States v. John F. GrismoreTenth Circuit· 1977-11-04· cited 123×
- United States v. Jessie Oliver and Gregory CooperSecond Circuit· 1980-07-14· cited 107×
- United States v. Reginald E. DavidD.C. Circuit· 1975-10-25· cited 80×
- Swain v. SchweikerSupreme Court· 1982-11-08· cited 51×
- United States v. Johnny KiblerFourth Circuit· 1982-01-08· cited 48×
- Lester Paul Brown v. Warden, Great Meadow Correctional FacilitySecond Circuit· 1982-06-23· cited 31×
- Albert Seidner v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1958-11-17· cited 21×
- United States v. Vito DebellisFirst Circuit· 1981-04-21· cited 17×
- United States v. ZovluckS.D. New York· 1977-01-19· cited 10×
- United States v. AlbericoD. Colorado· 1977-12-23· cited 8×
Other cases named United States v. Blohm
2 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.