United States v. Karl J. Bray

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \The mere fact that a judge has previously expressed himself on a particular point of law is not sufficient to show personal bias or prejudice.\
• failure to recuse upheld where plaintiff stated, inter alia, that he had filed a brief with the court accusing the judge of bribery, conspiracy and obstruction of justice
• “The mere fact that a judge has previously expressed himself on a particular point of law is not sufficient to show personal bias or prejudice.”
• “The mere fact that a judge has previously expressed himself on a particular point of law is not sufficient to show personal bias or prejudice.”
• “The mere fact that a judge has previously expressed himself on a particular point of law is not sufficient to show personal bias or prejudice.”
• “The mere fact that a judge has previously expressed himself on a particular point of law is not sufficient to show personal bias or prejudice.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).