· 2/8/2008
United States v. Birdine
Citations
- 515 F.3d 842
- 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 2787
- 2008 WL 341468
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- sufficiency of evidence to support conviction is reviewed de novo, viewing evidence in light most favorable to jury verdict
- sufficiency of evidence to sustain conviction is reviewed de novo, viewing evidence in light most favorable to verdict, and giving verdict benefit of all reasonable inferences
- sufficiency of evidence to sustain conviction is reviewed de novo, viewing evidence in light most favorable to jury verdict, and giving verdict benefit of all reasonable inferences
- sufficiency of evidence to support conviction is reviewed de novo, viewing evidence in light most favorable to jury verdict, and giving verdict benefit of all reasonable inferences
- sufficiency of evidence to sustain conviction is reviewed de novo
- articulating the standard of review
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Loken, Wollman, Shepherd
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.