Skip to main content
· 2/8/2008

United States v. Birdine

Citations

  • 515 F.3d 842
  • 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 2787
  • 2008 WL 341468

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • sufficiency of evidence to support conviction is reviewed de novo, viewing evidence in light most favorable to jury verdict
  • sufficiency of evidence to sustain conviction is reviewed de novo, viewing evidence in light most favorable to verdict, and giving verdict benefit of all reasonable inferences
  • sufficiency of evidence to sustain conviction is reviewed de novo, viewing evidence in light most favorable to jury verdict, and giving verdict benefit of all reasonable inferences
  • sufficiency of evidence to support conviction is reviewed de novo, viewing evidence in light most favorable to jury verdict, and giving verdict benefit of all reasonable inferences
  • sufficiency of evidence to sustain conviction is reviewed de novo
  • articulating the standard of review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Loken, Wollman, Shepherd

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.